THE GUARDIAN,
Letters
Thursday February 22, 2001
LAW VIOLATES
SEX WORKERS
| We
condemn last week's police and immigration raid on women working in
Soho as a violation of human and legal rights (Foreign bodies,
Women, G2, February 20). In the name of "protecting" women
from trafficking, about 40 women, including a woman from Iraq, were
arrested, detained and in some cases summarily removed from Britain.
If any of these women have been trafficked - whether into
prostitution, domestic work or marriage - they deserve protection
and resources, not punishment by expulsion.
We know that a number of
those arrested have fled to UK because of the war in Kosovo and have
made asylum claims. Some are rape victims. Some have young children.
From our experience, the draconian voucher and dispersal system
deprives asylum seekers and their families of enough to eat and
other basic necessities of life. It is hardly surprising if some
women end up as sex workers to feed their children and themselves.
Having forced women into
destitution, the government first criminalised those who begged. Now
it is trying to use prostitution as a way to make deportation of the
vulnerable more acceptable. We will not allow such injustice to go
unchallenged.
Niki Adams
Legal Action for Women
Tony Benn MP,
Ian Macdonald QC,
Gareth Peirce
and other legal and immigration professionals |
The
Soho raids to "liberate" victims of trafficking was an
abuse of power. Women were led to believe they could expect
protection, only to find themselves arrested and deported. This raid
lays the basis for trafficking legislation which would give the
police greater power of arrest, while the women on whose behalf
they're supposedly acting would no longer need to give evidence -
the police, not the victim, would testify about the truth of her
situation. She would have been deported before the trial. How
convenient and corrupting.
For this dehumanisation of
women we have to thank people like Julie Bindel of North London
University, quoted in your article, who reduce to pornographic flesh
the sex workers they research. Bindel seems particularly concerned
about interracial sex: "... the men [in Cambodia] want white
women, the men [in Thailand] want black women". What if some
gentlemen prefer blondes and others brunettes? Is this a reason to
persecute women, or even men? Surely the crime of trafficking is
violence against women, not sex with men.
We recently objected that
some projects, some funded by the Home Office, are not independent
of the police and are being drawn into "intelligence
gathering". While we picketed the Home Office following the
Soho raids, they evoked no protest from these projects - some girls'
jobs are more important than other girls', especially if the others
are "foreigners".
Nina Lopez-Jones
English Collective of Prostitutes |
This is the full list of
signatories of Legal Action for Women's letter
Reverend Francis Ackroyd, Tottenham
Niki Adams, Legal Action for Women
Cristel Amiss, Black Women's Rape Action Project
Tony Benn, MP
David Burgess, Winstanley-Burgess
Sara Callaway, Black Women for Wages for Housework
Colin Hutchinson, Two Garden Court Chambers
Alastair Lyon, Birnberg, Peirce & Partners
Ian Macdonald, QC
Ben Martin, Payday
Sonali Naik, Chair, Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants
Explo Nani Kolfi, African Liberation Support Campaign
Anne Neale, Women Against Rape
Gareth Peirce, Birnberg, Peirce & Partners
Sr. Barbara Porter, Social Justice Desk, Conference of Religious of
England & Wales
Sawsan Salim, Kurdistan Refugee Women's Organisation
Michael Schwarz, Bindman & Co
Richard Solly & Arlington Trottman, Churches Commission for Racial
Justice
Anne-Marie Tootell, Wilson & Co
and other legal professionals, women and men
Sex
Workers
All
Women Count
|